SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 620

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN, J.
Girijesh Nandan Kumar, Son of Harnandan Sharma - Petitioner
Versus
The Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University Bhagalpur, through the Vice Chancellor and Ors. – Respondents
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2605 of 2024
Decided On : 09-07-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Sarv Deo Singh, Adv., Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. Anjani Kumar, Sr. Adv., Mr. Ashhar Mustafa, Adv., Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv., Mr. Jitendra Prasad Singh, Sr. Adv., Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Kumar Pandey, Adv.

The Vice-Chancellor of a university has the authority to suspend and take disciplinary action against officers, including the Registrar, as per the Bihar State University Act, 1976.

Headnote:(A) Bihar State University Act, 1976 - Sections 10(6), 10(11), and 10(18) - Jurisdiction of Vice-Chancellor - The Vice-Chancellor has the power to suspend and take disciplinary action against university officers, including the Registrar, as per the provisions of the Act. The court found that the previous ruling in C.W.J.C. No. 4103 of 2019 was incorrect in limiting this authority. (Paras 22, 33, 34)

(B) Article 311 of the Constitution of India - The court held that Article 311 does not apply to suspension, which is not considered a punishment but a temporary measure pending inquiry. (Paras 12, 21)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, an Associate Professor, was suspended by the Vice-Chancellor, who was deemed to lack jurisdiction. The petitioner argued that the Vice-Chancellor's actions were arbitrary and violated principles of natural justice. (Paras 4, 5)

Findings of Court:
The court ruled that the Vice-Chancellor had the authority to suspend the petitioner and that the suspension was valid under the Bihar State University Act. (Paras 33, 34)

Issues: The main issue was whether the Vice-Chancellor had the jurisdiction to suspend the Registrar. (Paras 22, 34)

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the Vice-Chancellor's power to take disciplinary action, including suspension, is explicitly granted by the Bihar State University Act, and that Article 311 does not restrict this power. (Paras 12, 33)

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.)

Heard Mr. Sarv Deo Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr Anjani Kumar, learned Senior Counsel for the University assisted by Mr. Ashhar Mustafa and Mr. Jitendra Prasad Singh, learned Senior Counsel for the Hon’ble Chancellor assisted by Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Kumar Pandey.

2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and for the reasons stated in this interlocutory application, this I.A. No. 01/2024 is allowed and the reliefs prayed in this interlocutory application shall also be treated as a part of the relief prayed in the main writ application.

3. That the present writ application is being filed on behalf of the petitioners for the following relief(s):-

    “(i) To quash the Office Order No. 08/2024 contained in memo no. 327-395 dated 08.01.2024, by which the petitioner has been put under suspension. However, the said office order is without jurisdiction on the ground of that the Vice-chancellor is not the Appointing Authority and the action is against the Article 311 of the Constitution of India and against the Act and Statute4 of the Bihar State University Act, 1976.

    (ii) Through IA No. 01 of 2024, the prayer in the writ application was sought to be amended by adding additional prayer to quash Office Order No. 13 of 2024 contained in Memo No. 429-434 dated 16.01.2024, by which a committee has been constituted by the University for departmental enquiry against the petitioner.

    And for any other relief/reliefs the petitioner may be found entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

4. The facts of the present case is that the petitioner is Associate Professor in the Department of English at J.N.L. College, Khagaul under the Patliputra University, Patna. After following the due process of selection the petitioner was appointed as Registrar in Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur. The appointment letter was issued by letter no. 1272 dated 05.08.2022 from the Office of Governor Secretariat, Bihar, Patna, (Annexure-P/1 of the writ petition). The petitioner was relieved from the college by the Principal of the J.N.L. College, Khagaul by letter no. 364/GS/2022 dated 06.08.2022. The said letter of relieving was issued considering the appointment order dated 05.08.2022 as Registrar of the Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur (Annexure-P/2 of the writ petition). The petitioner given his joining before the University as Registrar. An Office Order No. 86/2022 which contained in Memo No. 8837-8907 dated 06.08.2022 issued by the University, the petitioner assumed the charge of the Office of Registrar (Annexure-P/3 of the writ petition).

5. Thereafter, the petitioner had written a letter to the Registrar of the Patliputra University, Patna on 08.08.2022 for grant of lien as well as relieving from Patliputra University. The said request letter was submitted by the petitioner in the light of appointment letter issued by the Office of Governor Secretariat, Bihar, Patna, dated 05.08.2022 being appointed as Registrar of the Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur (Annexure-P/4 of the writ petition). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are some glaring facts which demonstrate that the present Vice Chancellor is not liking the petitioner as Registrar. There are some prejudicial circumstances in respect of this petitioner in the eyes of present Vice-Chancellor, meaning thereby in the service career the Vice-Chancellor has inimical attitude with this petitioner and therefore, he could not digested this petitioner as Registrar of the University. The petitioner was appointed as Registrar on 05.08.2022 and the present Vice-Chancellor joined as Vice-Chancellor of the University on 23.08.2022 in the light of order issued from the Governor Secretariat, Bihar, Patna. Having the prejudicial attitude and with the malice view, the Vice-Chancellor issued an Office Order No. 08/2024 which contained in memo no. 327-395 dated 08.01.2024 (Annexure-P/5 of writ petition) by which the pet

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top