SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(SC) 623

VIKRAM NATH, SANDEEP MEHTA
Amazon. Com NV Investment Holdings LLC – Appellant
Versus
Competition Commission of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Gopal Subramanium, Sr. Adv. Mr. Arvind Varma, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anand Swarup Pathak, Adv. Mr. Shashank Gautam, Adv. Ms. Sreemoyee Deb, Adv. Ms. Anubhuti Mishra, Adv. Mr. Param Tandon, Adv. Ms. Nandini Sharma, Adv. Ms. Anisha Bothra, Adv. Mr. Pavan Bhushan, Adv. Ms. Smridhi Sharma, Adv. Ms. Mahima Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Jayavardhan Singh, Adv. Mr. Raghav Kohli, Adv. Mr. Ankit Malhotra, Adv. Ms. Hima Lawrence, Adv. Mr. Kunal Chatterji, AOR Ms. Shrayani Shekhar, Adv. Ms. Nileena Thomas V., Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. N. Venkataraman, A.S.G. Mr. Sanyat Lodha, AOR Mr. Manu Chaturvedi, Adv. Mr. Chandrashekhara Bharati, Adv. Ms. Shivani Mehta, Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal, Adv. Ms. Ayushi Gaur, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR Mr. Rajat Sehgal, AOR Mr. Samyak Jain, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

VIKRAM NATH, J.

A. INTRODUCTION

1. Merger control under the Competition Act, 20021 [In short “the Act”] is a forward-looking instrument of economic regulation. Its objective is to preserve competitive markets in India by ensuring that combinations which may alter market structure are examined before they take effect. This statutory design necessarily rests on disclosure. The notice in respect of a proposed combination must present the transaction as it is intended to operate in substance, including its structure, its inter-connected steps, and the rights and arrangements that give it commercial meaning, so that the Commission is placed in a position to undertake an informed assessment of likely competitive effects. The law, therefore, insists on substance and requires that the regulator be enabled to examine the transaction as a composite whole.

2. At the same time, the Commission is a creature of statute. Its authority, whether to impose penalties, to draw adverse inferences from alleged non-disclosure, or to disturb an approval already granted, must be traced to the Act and exercised within the limits that the legislature has set. Where the statute requires satisfaction of

                                      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                      1
                                      2
                                      3
                                      4
                                      5
                                      6
                                      7
                                      8
                                      9
                                      10
                                      11
                                      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                      supreme today icon
                                      logo-black

                                      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                      Please visit our Training & Support
                                      Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                      qr

                                      Scan Me!

                                      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
                                      whatsapp-icon Back to top