P.S.NARAYANA
Seepally Thirupathi – Appellant
Versus
Repelli mallikarjun – Respondent
( 2 ) SRI D. Seshadri Naidu, learned counsel entered appearance representing respondents.
( 3 ) SRI T. Jagadish, the learned Counsel representing Sri V. Mehar Sreenivasarao, the learned Counsel for revision petitioners plaintiffs made the following submissions : the learned Counsel for the revision petitioners had placed the report of the commissioner before this Court and would contend that the point from which, the measurements to be taken, in fact, had not been properly fixed and the procedure to be followed under the Andhra Pradesh Survey and Boundaries Act also had not been followed. The learned Counsel in all fairness would submit that it is no doubt a lapse on the part of the petitioners-plaintiffs in not raising objections to the report of the commissioner, but, however, this application filed under peculiar circumstances may have to be considered on a different footing, for the reason that what is being prayed for is the scientific investigation for the purpose of actual localization whether the plaint schedule property falls within S. No. 224 or 225. The learned Counsel also explained the scope and ambit of "expert investi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.