SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 269

P.S.NARAYANA, G.BIKSHAPATHY
Syed Fahim Arif – Appellant
Versus
Rahmamunnisa Begum – Respondent


P. S. NARAYANA, J.

( 1 ) INTRODUCTION: challenge is made by the unsuccessful appellants/plaintiffs who were non-suited by the learned VII Senior Civil Judge, City civil Court, Hyderabad, in O. S. No. 318/96 dated 28-1-2002. The suit was instituted by the appellants/plaintiffs for declaration that they are the lawful owners of premises bearing No. 8-2-624/a/l/2 and 8-2-624/a/l/ 3, between Road Nos. 10 and 11 of Banjara hills, Hyderabad, formerly known as Plot no. 83 in S. No. l 17, Shaikpet Village, within hyderabad West, for a perpetual injunction restraining the respondents/defendants, their men, agents and servants from making any construction, for a mandatory injunction to demolish and remove the constructions already made and also for such other suitable reliefs. The learned Judge recorded the evidence of the 1st plaintiff as PW-1 and also the evidence of DW-1, the 1st defendant, had been recorded on Commission. Exs. A-1 to A-14 and Exs. B-1 to B-15 were marked on behalf of the respective parties and the learned Judge after recording the findings found Issues 1, 2, 3, and 4 against appellants/plaintiffs and came to the conclusion that they failed to prove their right and posses






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top