SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(All) 233

A.N.VERMA
ABDUL JABBAR – Appellant
Versus
2nd ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, ORAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.K.Biswas, R.DWIVEDI, Rajeshji Verma, V.K.Gupta

A. N. VERMA, J.

( 1 ) THESE are two connected petitions arising out of two suits filed by the plaintiffs-respondents against the petitioners in each of the two petitions for the eviction of the petitioners.

( 2 ) THE relevant facts are these: The respondents Nos. 3 and 4 (in Writ Petition No. 5955 of 1979)filed two suits against the petitioners of the two petitions on the ground that they were the tenants of the respective accommodations and despite a notice determining the tenancy, they did not vacate the accommodation in dispute.

( 3 ) THE petitioners contested the two suits and denied the title and ownership of the plaintiffs. The petitioners asserted that they were themselves the owners of the property in dispute. They also denied having been served with any notice.

( 4 ) THE trial court accepted the version of facts as given by the petitioners and dismissed the two suits,


( 5 ) THE landlords filed Revisions under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act and the same have been allowed. The learned District Judge allowing the Revisions has decreed the plaintiffs-respondents suits for the ejectment of the petitioners as well as for recovery of arrears of rent etc.

( 6 )



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top