SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 556

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
D. Sujata – Appellant
Versus
Revoorl Vasantha – Respondent


( 1 ) THE defendants is O. S. No. 67 of 2003 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Kamareddy filed this revision aggrieved by the order dated 15-12-2004 passed in I. A. No. 193 of 2004.

( 2 ) THE respondents filed the suit for recovery of certain amounts from the petitioners. The trial of the suit commenced. On behalf of P. W. 1, an affidavit in lieu of chief-examination was filed, on 15-4-2004, along with two documents, dated 9-5-1997 and 9-4-2000, respectively, titled as agreements. The trial Court marked them as exs. A-3 and A-4.

( 3 ) ON 29-6-2004, the petitioners are said to have been furnished copies of the affidavit as well as documents. They filed I. A. No. 193 of 2004, on 2-7-2004, under Order 13 Rule 6 of C. P. C. , with a prayer to reject the documents marked as Exs. A-3 and A-4. Their contention was that the documents have the effect of creating interest in immovable property, and as such, they were required to be registered under Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908. An objection was raised as to the amount of stamp duty, to be paid thereon. The I. A. , was resisted by the respondents. Through its order under revision, the trial Court rejected the I. A. , on takin







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top