SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 679

P.SWAROOP REDDY
Polisetty Seetharam anjaneyulu Sons, Guntur – Appellant
Versus
Public Prosecutor, High Court of A. P. – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS revision case is filed against the judgment of the learned i Additional Sessions Judge, Ongole in crl. A. No. 198 of 2002, in which the learned judge confirmed the conviction of the present petitioners, imposed by the learned iii Additional Judicial Magistrate of First class, Ongole in C. C. No. 76 of 2001 for an offence under Section 138 of the negotiable Instruments Act. The learned magistrate convicted A-1 company and A-2 and A-3, its partners, for the offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments act and sentenced A-2 and A-3 to simple imprisonment for six months each and directed to pay compensation of Rs. 5. 00 lakhs (Rs. Five lakhs) each, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three months each. The learned Magistrate also sentenced A-1 to pay fine of Rs. 500-00 in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three months.

( 2 ) THE case arose out of a private complaint filed by the complainant, the present second respondent, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The allegation is that the complainant is a partner of A-1 firm which does tobacco business. A-1 to A-3 had regular business dealings with the complainant since 8 - 9 years.








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top