( 1 ) THIS Appeal is preferred as against the judgment and decree in O. S. No. 42/82 on the file of Additional Subordinate Judge, rajahmundry by defendants 1 and 13. Though the factual matrix appears to be a bit voluminous, the short but the crucial question which falls for consideration in the present appeal is the interpretation of the Clauses in ex. B-1 said to nave been executed by sri Gadireddy Rama Rao and the validity thereof in the light of the provisions of the indian Succession Act, 1925, hereinafter in short referred to as "act" for the purpose of convenience.

( 2 ) ORIGINALLY, the plaintiff Thota Venkata seshu Bai, represented by her Power of attorney holderthota Ramchandra Rao, filed the suit praying for the following reliefs: (a) to declare the right and title of the plaintiff in all the plaint A to D schedule properties; to direct the defendants to deliver the plaint A and B Schedule properties to the plaintiff; to direct the 1st defendant to deliver the plaint C Schedule properties in specie or to pay their value; to account for the plaint D schedule cash and to direct the defendants to pay future mesne profits on the plaint B Schedule properties; or in the alternat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document