SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 1041

A.GOPAL REDDY
K. R. Krishna Murthy – Appellant
Versus
Hyderabad Allwyn Ltd. – Respondent


( 1 ) THE defendant in the court below filed this appeal against the judgment and decree of the I Additional judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad dated 29-7-1987 passed in O. S. No. 712 of 1980, decreeing the suit of the respondent/plaintiff for possession of Quarter No. 22 (A), Municipal no 7-2-1790, Czech Colony, Sanathnagar, hyderabad and directing the defendant to pay a sum of Rs. 11,000/- towards past damages for use and occupation and future damages at the rate of Rs. 1,000/- from the date of filing of the suit till the date of delivery of the quarter.

( 2 ) A short resume of facts, which are necessary for disposal of the appeal, are as under:

( 3 ) FOR the sake of convenience the parties are arrayed as shown in the Court below.

( 4 ) M/s. Hyderabad Allwyn Limited/ plaintiff, which was subsequently taken over by M/s. Voltas Limited during the pendency of appeal with effect from 1-4-1993 under a scheme of rehabilitation by Board for industrial Finance and Reconstruction (BIFR) vide order dated 4-4-1994, instituted the suit alleging that it obtained suit schedule quarter along with various other quarters from its original owner M/s. Khan Bahadur ahmed Alladin and Sons by way of le









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top