SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 338

G.YETHIRAJULU
Sajja Chimpiraiah – Appellant
Versus
Gaddam Venkata Subbaiah (died) – Respondent


( 1 ) C. R. P. NO. 92 of 2002 is filed by the second respondent in E. P. No. 46 of 1999 against the order dated 17-09-2001 in e. P. No. 46 of 1999 in O. S. No. 319 of 1972 on the file of the Additional Junior Civil judge, Parchur.

( 2 ) C. R. P. NO. 2446 of 2002 is also filed by him against the order dated 17-09-2001 of the same Court in I. A. No. 269 of 1999 in o. S. No. 319 of 1972.

( 3 ) SINCE both the revision petitions relate to the same transaction and in the same suit, the revision petitions are clubbed and this common order is passed.

( 4 ) THE second respondent in C. R. P. No. 92 of 2002 filed O. S. No. 319 of 1972 against the third respondent for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 26-03-1972 and obtained a decree on 12-01-1977. The first appeal covered by a. S. No. 11 of 1977 preferred by the revision petitioner and the second appeal covered by s. A. No. 78 of 1999 preferred by him before the High Court of A. P. were dismissed and the decree became final.

( 5 ) AS per the terms of the decree, the judgment-debtors have to execute a sale deed in favour of the decree holder, on payment of the balance sale consideration by him. The judgment debtors did not exe

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top