SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 1000

S.ANANDA REDDY
Koneru Venkata Subbalah – Appellant
Versus
Koneru Venugopal – Respondent


S. ANANDA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THESE two revision petitions are filed by the 2nd and 1st respondents against the judgment and decretal order of the learned subordinate Judge in O. P. No. 83 of 1987. As both the revisions are against the same order, they are disposed of by this common order.

( 2 ) THE 1st Respondent in both the revisions filed the O. P. , under Section 17 of the Arbitration Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) praying the Court to confirm the Award, dated 15-9-1985 passed by the arbitrators; to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to deliver possession of the lime garden and house bearing No. 17/458 and the down portion of D. No. 17/358/b-1, and further to direct the 1st Respondent to cause production of the original award and the consent letter and to pay a sum of rs. 30,000/- and further to direct the 2nd respondent to pay Rs. 62,000. 00 to the petitioner as per the award, apart from declaring the 1/3rd right in Item No. 10 of the vacant site bearing D. No. 18/39 situate in B. Syedsab Street, Cuddapah and to effect the partition of the said vacant site into three equal shares and to deliver one such share to the Petitioner. The said O. P. was filed alleging that the Peti





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top