P.S.NARAYANA, B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
Gurram Satyaseshamamba Gurram satya Santamani – Appellant
Versus
Gurram Krishnavenamma (since died) rep. by her legal representatives – Respondent
( 1 ) ONE of us (P. S. Narayana, J.) in C. R. P. No. 4976 of 2003 by an order dt. 20-10-2003 referred the following questions to be decided by an appropriate Division Bench in view of the general importance of the questions involved in the matter which are as hereunder: (1) Whether the Civil Revision Petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India arising out of tenancy proceedings also are governed by the ninety days period of limitation in view of the rules framed under article 227 of the Constitution of india and also the appellate side rules? (2) Whether the Judgment and decree in the prior litigation which has been carried upto second appeal operate as resjudicata relating to the validity of the Will especially in the light of the order passed in Review C. M. P. No. 14770 of 1998? (3) Whether the Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India be dismissed on the ground of laches? (4) Whether the appreciation of evidence relating to the validity of the Will in the Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India can be put on the same standard as appreciation of evidence in regular civil appeal and if so
Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai
Sankar Reddy v. Mahalakshmamma
H. Venkata Sastry and Sons, by its Manager v. H. Venkata Sastry (Died) and others
Naresh Charan Das Gupta v. Paresh Charan Das Gupta
M/s. Filmistan (Private) Limited v. Balkrishna Bhiwa
G.ESHWARAIAH Vs MOHARUDRAPPA KHENI
BOMBAY METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,BOMBAY Vs GOKAK PATEL VOLKART Limited
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.