SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 573

P.S.NARAYANA, B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
Gurram Satyaseshamamba Gurram satya Santamani – Appellant
Versus
Gurram Krishnavenamma (since died) rep. by her legal representatives – Respondent


P. S. NARAYANA, J.

( 1 ) ONE of us (P. S. Narayana, J.) in C. R. P. No. 4976 of 2003 by an order dt. 20-10-2003 referred the following questions to be decided by an appropriate Division Bench in view of the general importance of the questions involved in the matter which are as hereunder: (1) Whether the Civil Revision Petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India arising out of tenancy proceedings also are governed by the ninety days period of limitation in view of the rules framed under article 227 of the Constitution of india and also the appellate side rules? (2) Whether the Judgment and decree in the prior litigation which has been carried upto second appeal operate as resjudicata relating to the validity of the Will especially in the light of the order passed in Review C. M. P. No. 14770 of 1998? (3) Whether the Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India be dismissed on the ground of laches? (4) Whether the appreciation of evidence relating to the validity of the Will in the Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India can be put on the same standard as appreciation of evidence in regular civil appeal and if so

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top