M. NARAYANA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS judgment, according to Law, arises out of a civil miscellaneous appeal, filed by the sole appellant, against rl and R2, under Section 30 of the workmen s Compensation Act, 1923, questioning the, validity and legality, of the adjudications made by, and set forth in para 2, infra.

( 2 ) ORDERS dated 31-7-2003, of the commissioner for Workmen s Compensation, nizamabad, made in WC No. 83/2002, of his file.

( 3 ) PERUSED the material papers of the record.

( 4 ) ARGUMENTS were heard.

( 5 ) THE sole appellant in this c. M. A. corresponds, to the sole applicant in the said WC No. 83 of 2002, on the file of the said Commissioner. R. 1 and R. 2 herein correspond, respectively, to Opposite Party nos. l and 2 therein, being, respectively, the owner and the Insurance Company of the accident vehicle.

( 6 ) THE parties are, hereinafter, referred to, as the applicant, the owner and the insurance Company, lest, so specified.

( 7 ) THE sole applicant filed the said w. C. No. 84 of 2002, before the said commissioner, against the owner and the insurance Company, under Section 22 of the said Workmen s Compensation Act, 1923 (W. C. Act, 1923), for recovery of total compen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document