SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 943

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Pothuri Thulasidas – Appellant
Versus
Potru Nageswara Rao – Respondent


L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS C. M. S. A. , is filed against the judgment and Decree, dated 17. 6. 2002, passed by the Court of the principal Senior Civil Judge, Narsaraopet, in a. S. No. 9 of 2002. The subject-matter of a. S. No. 9 of 2002 is an order passed in e. A. No. 494 of 2001 by the Court of Junior civil Judge, Chilakaluripeta.

( 2 ) THE facts that gave rise to filing of the C. M. S. A. , are as under: the appellant is the owner of a saw- mill installed in his land at Chilakaluripeta. The same was leased to the respondent in the year 1983. Thereafter, disputes arose between the appellant and the respondent. The appellant got issued notices terminating the lease. When he could not recover the possession, he filed O. S. No. 104 of 1990, in the Court of Junior Civil Judge, chilakaluripeta, initially, for the relief of restraining the respondent, by way of a permanent injunction, from removing the machinery of saw-mill, its equipment, tools, the zinc sheets shed, or from replacing them with any other sheets, and for restraining the respondent from running the saw-mill. Subsequently, he got the relief amended, to include a mandatory, injunction to restore the suit schedule pr





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top