SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 1463

S.R.K.PRASAD
A. YASHODA – Appellant
Versus
DIGAMBER RAO SURVE – Respondent


S. R. K. PRASAD, J.

( 1 ) THESE two revisions are directed against the judgments rendered in r. a. nos. 129 of 2000 and 229 of 2000 by the additional chief judge, city small causes court, hyderabad.

( 2 ) THE facts that arise for consideration can be briefly stated as follows: eviction petition in r. c. no. 621 of 1998 was presented against the tenant by the landlord before the ii additional rent controller, hyderabad. It is being contested by the tenant. The landlord has claimed that the tenant has committed wilful default in payment of rents and also sought for bona fide requirement of the premises. During the pendency of the petition, la. No. 500 of 1999 has been presented under Section 11 (1) of the andhra pradesh buildings (lease, rent and eviction) control act, 1960, (hereinafter referred to as the act ) to direct the tenant to pay or deposit arrears of rent from 16. 4. 1998 to 30. 9. 1999 at rs. 900/- and also future rents. Thereupon, the lower court marked the written statement of the defendant in o. s. no. 2020 of 1998 and allowed the application with a direction to deposit rs. 100/- per month being the admitted rent. Aggrieved by the same, the tenant has carried the matte







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top