S.R.K.PRASAD
A. YASHODA – Appellant
Versus
DIGAMBER RAO SURVE – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE two revisions are directed against the judgments rendered in r. a. nos. 129 of 2000 and 229 of 2000 by the additional chief judge, city small causes court, hyderabad.
( 2 ) THE facts that arise for consideration can be briefly stated as follows: eviction petition in r. c. no. 621 of 1998 was presented against the tenant by the landlord before the ii additional rent controller, hyderabad. It is being contested by the tenant. The landlord has claimed that the tenant has committed wilful default in payment of rents and also sought for bona fide requirement of the premises. During the pendency of the petition, la. No. 500 of 1999 has been presented under Section 11 (1) of the andhra pradesh buildings (lease, rent and eviction) control act, 1960, (hereinafter referred to as the act ) to direct the tenant to pay or deposit arrears of rent from 16. 4. 1998 to 30. 9. 1999 at rs. 900/- and also future rents. Thereupon, the lower court marked the written statement of the defendant in o. s. no. 2020 of 1998 and allowed the application with a direction to deposit rs. 100/- per month being the admitted rent. Aggrieved by the same, the tenant has carried the matte
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.