SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 1155

P.S.NARAYANA
Naseem Begum – Appellant
Versus
S. M. Kaleem – Respondent


P. S. NARAYANA, J.

( 1 ) THE unsuccessful defendants in both the courts below are the appellants and the respondent in the present Second Appeal is the plaintiff. The respondent/plaintiff instituted a suit O. S. No. 577/93 on the file of v Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, hyderabad for declaration that he is the absolute owner of plaint schedule property and to evict the appellants/defendants and to deliver vacant possession of the suit schedule house, for past and future mesne profits and costs of the suit. The said suit was resisted by the appellants/defendants by filing a written statement in detail and on the strength of the respective pleadings of the parties, after settlement of Issues, the court of first instance had recorded the evidence of P. W. 1 and P. W. 2 and D. W. 1 and D. W. 2 and had marked Exs. A-1 to A-45 and after recording the appropriate findings ultimately had decreed the suit. The defendants, aggrieved by the same, had preferred A. S. No. 214/2000 on the file of x Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, hyderabad and the appellate Court after recording the findings had ultimately dismissed the Appeal, with costs, and aggrieved by the same, the appellant














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top