SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 1491

S.R.K.PRASAD, B.PRAKASH RAO
G. Masoom – Appellant
Versus
S. K. Khader Vali – Respondent


S. R. K. PRASAD, J.

( 1 ) ORIGINALLY, this civil miscellaneous appeal was heard by a learned Single Judge of this Court and he framed the following question:"whether the owner of a vehicle can make a claim not only for damages caused to his vehicle but also business loss which he insured consequent on the damage having been caused to his vehicle. "

( 2 ) THE matter was asked to be placed before a Division Bench. The matter is placed before this Bench. An accident occurred after commencement of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, hereinafter referred to as the Act . The owner of the vehicle claimed business loss under section 166 of the Act. This is challenged by the Insurance Company. This Court has to consider whether the business loss can be claimed by the owner before the Claims Tribunal. Special Government pleader is appointed as amicus curiae to assist the Court in this case apart from hearing on both sides.

( 3 ) THE learned Counsel for the claimant mainly contends that the owner of the vehicle is entitled to compensation before the Tribunal as the jurisdiction of the Civil court has been ousted and he is entitled to claim business loss before the Tribunal.

( 4 ) THE learned Counse












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top