SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 919

R.M.BAPAT, GHULAM MOHAMMED, G.ROHINI, B.SUDERSHAN REDDY, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
A. P. S. R. T. C. – Appellant
Versus
B. VIJAYA – Respondent


A. R. LAKSHMANAN, C. J.

( 1 ) WHAT is the reasonable interest payable on the amount of compensation awarded to a claimant in a motor accident claim case is the issue involved in these matters referred to by a Division Bench of this Court for an authoritative pronouncement.

( 2 ) THE awards passed by the respective Tribunals, out of which, the present appeals arose, were challenged on various grounds including the ground that the Tribunals ought not to have granted interest at 12% per annum on the amount of compensation awarded. When the appeals came up for admission together with the interlocutory applications for stay of the awards, on a consideration of the decisions of the supreme Court in S. Kaushnuma Begum v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and the Full bench decision of this Court in General manager, APSRTC v. Sangum Bhagyamma wherein it was held that the claimants are entitled to interest at 9% per annum, on one hand, and the decisions of the Supreme court in Smt. Chameli Wati v. Delhi Municipal corporation of Delhi, Jagbir Singh v. General manager, Punjab Roadways, Dr. K. R. Tandon v. Om Prakash and a Division Bench decision of this Court in Shobha Rani v. New india Assurance






















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top