SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(AP) 1385

S.R.K.PRASAD
Zamrud Begum – Appellant
Versus
K. Md. Haneef – Respondent


S. R. K. PRASAD, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner seeks quashing of the proceedings in Crl. R. P. No,74 of 1999 as well as the order passed in crl. M. P. No. 1850 of 1992 in M. C. No. 21 of 1986 on the file of Judicial First Class magistrate, Kurnool.

( 2 ) A brief resume of background of facts is necessary.

( 3 ) IT is an undisputed fact that the petitioner married the 1st respondent herein under Muslim Law. The petitioner herein presented M. C. No. 21 of 1986 claiming maintenance against the 1st respondent herein. The lower Court granted maintenance. Some amounts were said to have been paid. The order has become final. The 1st respondent herein presented Crl. M. P. No. 1850 of 1992 in M. C. No. 21 of 1986 for cancellation of the maintenance granted in favour of the petitioner. The said petition was dismissed on 4-3-1994 and the matter was carried in revision being C. R. P. No. 36 of 1994 before the III Additional Sessions judge at Kurnool. The HI Additional Sessions judge, Kurnool, through his order dated 23-6-1995, remanded the matter to adjudicate the Crlm. P. No. 1850 of 1992 afresh. Thereupon the Judicial First Class Magistrate, kurnool set aside the order granting maintenance on the g






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top