SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 479

V.V.S.RAO, S.B.SINHA
APSRTC, Khammam Region, Khammam – Appellant
Versus
P. Nageswara Rao – Respondent


S. B. SINHA, C. J.

( 1 ) ALL these matters involving common question of law are being disposed of by this common judgment. However, the fact is being noticed from Writ Appeal No. 1189 of 2000.

( 2 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated July 18, 2000 passed by a learned single Judge of this Court in Writ petition No. 5802 of 2000 whereby and whereunder the writ petition filed by the 1st respondent herein was allowed. The question which arises for consideration in this appeal is a short one. The respondent was serving as a Conductor under the appellant-Corporation. He was removed from service in relation whereto he filed an application before the Labour Court. An award was passed by the Labour Court directing his reinstatement without backwages. Although he was reinstated in service his pay was not fixed taking into consideration the notional increments whereafter the writ petition was filed.

( 3 ) THE learned single Judge having (regard to the various decisions of the Court in n. Raja Reddy v. Vice Chairman and Managing director, APSRTC Hyderabad, 1998 (2) ALD 317, T. Narayana v. Managing Director, apsrtc, Hyderabad, 1998 (3) ALD 304, The vice-Chairman and Ma






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top