SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 774

P.S.NARAYANA
Amtul Quayyum Humsira – Appellant
Versus
Munawar Fathima – Respondent


P. S. NARAYANA, J.

( 1 ) THIS Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the order passed in E. A. No. 37/2000 in E. P. No. 19/2000 in R. C. No. 638/95 on the file of Principal Rent controller, Hyderabad.

( 2 ) THE facts in brief are as follows:- the respondent in the present Revision filed E. A. No. 37/2000 in EP. No. 19/2000 in r. C. No. 638/95 on the file of Principal Rent controller, Hyderabad under Section 47 c. P. C. r/w Rule 23 (7) of A. P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Rules, 1961 and Section 15 of A. P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 and Section 151 C. P. C. for restoration of possession of the demised premises no. 22-6-1984, Pattargatti, Hyderabad. The respondent in the present Revision Petition is also respondent in the main R. C. No. 638/95 and the Judgment-debtor in E. P. No. 19/2000 and the Revision Petitioner-landlady filed r. C. NO. 638/95 against him (sic. her) and it was allowed on 22-4-1998 and subsequent thereto the respondent-tenant preferred rent appeal in R. A. 202/98 on the file of Hon ble chief Judge, Hyderabad Against the orders passed in R. C. No. 638/95 and after passing of eviction order both parties had entered

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top