P. RAMAKRISHNAM RAJU, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is posted before the Division Bench pursuant to an order of the learned single Judge who noticed apparent conflict between two decisions of learned single Judges reported in D. Hanumayya vs. G. Radhakrishna murthy and D. Anthoney vs. M. Raja Lakshmi, followed by G. Savitramma vs. T. Sarojini. Accordingly, observing that, "in the said circumstances, I deem this a fit case to be posted before a Division Bench of this Court for an authoritative decision as to whether this Court has the power to review its own orders arising under Section 21 (sic. 22) of the A. P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act; 1960", directed the office to place the papers before the Hon ble the Chief Justice for orders, for posting the matter before a Division bench.

( 2 ) TENANT is the petitioner whose revision petition was dismissed at the stage of admission on the ground that the respondent-landlord required the demised premises for starting business and that the said requirement is bona fide which was accepted by both the Tribunals and confirmed by the High court in revision. However, the petitioner filed an application for review. Responden

Click Here to Read the rest of this document