SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 1027

P.S.NARAYANA
Vaggu Agamaiah – Appellant
Versus
South Central Railway, Secunderabad – Respondent


P. S. NARAYANA, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is filed by the unsuccessful Decree-holders in EA No. 130 of 1998 in EP No. 10 of 1992 in OP No. 98 of 1996 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy.

( 2 ) THE 1st respondent, South Central Railway, represented by its Deputy Chief Engineer, Construction, Secunderabad filed an application EA No. 130 of 1998 in EP No. 10 of 1992 in OP No. 98 of 1986 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy under Order 1, Rule 10 CPC read with Section 151 CPC to be impleaded as a party to the proceeding. The contention of the 1st respondent, proposed party who intends to come on record is that the land was acquired at Kukatpally and Babbuguda village for the purpose of construction of goods shed at Sanathnagar Railway Station and the South Central Railway is an interested party in the said acquisition, but the Land Acquisition Officer alone was made party and the South Central Railway had appointed their own Advocate to defend their case and the Decree-holders filed EP seeking more amount than to which they are entitled to and hence there is a necessity to implead South Central Railway as a party to the litigation for the purpos





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top