( 1 ) HEARD Sri Vijay, learned counsel representing Sri K. Suryanarayana, learned Counsel for the petitioner.

( 2 ) THE revision is filed by the revision petitioner-plaintiff as against an order dated 30. 8. 1997, in S. R. No. 1144 of 1997 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Nalgonda as against an order directing to register suit as against the 1st defendant only if" it is otherwise in order and rejecting the plaint against defendants 2 and 3 in the suit i. e. , respondents 2 and 3 in the present revision on the ground that the claim against them is barred by limitation. A suit for recovery of an amount of Rs. 18,087/- was instituted by the revision petitioner-plaintiff, Indian overseas Bank, Nalgonda against the respondents, defendants I to 3 and the plaint was returned by the Court below to satisfy how the suit can be said to be within the limitation and the plaint was represented stating that in view of promissory letter issued by the 1st respondent-1st defendant and in the light of clause (3) to Section 25 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (for short the "act") the suit is within limitation. It may be appropriate to look into the allegations made in the