I.VENKATANARAYANA
Manoj Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
Lalchand Ahuja – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is a revision preferred by th. e petitioner-landlord against the order of the Chief Judge, City Small Causes court, Hyderabad dated 28th October, 1996 allowing RA No. 244 of 1993 and setting aside the order of eviction dated 12th April, 1993 passed by the Rent Controller, Secunderabad in RC No. 58 of 1989.
( 2 ) THE factual matrix leading to the filing of the revision petition is set out as hereunder : The revision petitioner-land lord filed RC No. 58 of 1989 on the file of the principal Rent Controller, Secunderabad seeking eviction of the respondent-tenant from his premises bearing No. 7-2-747 situate in General Market Street, Secunderabad on the ground of bona fide requirement under section 10 (3) (a) (iii) of the A. P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 (for short the Rent Control Act ). The respondent-tenant resisted the petition and contended that the petitioner-landlord does not require the premises and he does not have the experience in the jewellery business. In short, it is the contention of the respondent-tenant that the petition filed by the petitioner-landlord lacks bona fides. Based on the pleadings the parties we
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.