SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 69

NEELAM SANJIVA REDDY, N.Y.HANUMANTHAPPA
P. RAVINDER – Appellant
Versus
ETHIRAJAMMA – Respondent


N. Y. HANUMANTHAPPA, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition is filed to declare the judgment and decree dt: 2-4-1998 passed in L. G. A. No. 46/97 on the file of the Special Court under A. P. Land grabbing (Prohibition) Act confirming the judgment and decree dt: 21-7-1997 passed in O. P. No. 560/91 on the file of the Chief Judge, City Civil Court, hyderabad-cum-Special Tribunal under A. P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act.

( 2 ) THE said O. P. No. 560/91 was filed by the 1st respondent herein undersub-sec. (1) of Sec. 7-A r/w Sec. 8 (1) of A. P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 to declare the petitioners herein as land grabbers and for their eviction and also for payment of compensation of Rs. 20,000/- to the 1st respondent herein. The learned Trial Judge allowed the petition ordering eviction of the petitioners herein and disallowing the claim of the 1st respondent for compensation. Aggrieved by this, the petitioners carried the matter in appeal in L. G. A. No. 46/97 which was dismissed by the Appellate Court confirming the judgment and decree of the learned Trial Judge. Aggrieved by this, the present writ petition.

( 3 ) AN extent of 700 Sq. yards described as Plot No. 36 situated in S.
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top