SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 286

B.SUBHASHAN REDDY, VAMAN RAO
Gurram Rami Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


VAMAN RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India has been filed for a writ of Ceritiorari calling for the records relating to the judgment in L. G. C. No. 34 of 1996 dated 29-10-1997 on the file of the special Court under A. P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act at Hyderabad (for short the Special Court) and quash the same.

( 2 ) THE writ petitioners 1 and 2 are respondents 1 and 2 in LG. C. No. 34 of 1996 on the file of the Special Court. Respondent no. 2 in this writ petition is the petitioner before the Special Court. Respondent No. 4 herein is the respondent No. 3 in the said l. G. C.

( 3 ) A brief resume of facts culminating in filing of this writ petition may be given as follows: respondent No. 2 herein filed a petition before the Special Court asserting that she is the owner of the property of a house plot bearing No. 19 admeasuring 400 Square yards in Survey No. 50 of Sahebnagar village, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy district. She traces her title and possession through purchase under sale deed dated 23-1-1993 from respondent No. 4 in this petition. The said Jhansi Laxmi (Respondent no. 4 herein) had acquired title earlier under a registered s


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top