SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 353

N.Y.HANUMANTHAPPA, V.BHASKARA RAO
Commissioner of Survey, Settlements and Land Records, Government of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
G. Padmavathi – Respondent


N. Y. HANUMANTHAPPA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the learned single Judge of this Court in WP No. 16232 of 1992, dated 30-10-1998. The appellants herein are the respondents and the respondents herein are the petitioners in the writ petition.

( 2 ) THE rank of the parties is described herein as in the writ petition.

( 3 ) A few facts which are necessary to dispose of this appeal are as follows :one G. Narayaiia Swamy was the owner of Ac. S. OO of land in S. No. 129/10 of Shaikpet village forming part of Banjara Hills of Hyderabad, who had purchased the same under a registered sale-deed dated 21-1-1966. The said Narayana Swamy was the husband of G. Padmavathi, the 1st petitioner herein. Petitioners 2 and 4 are his sons and petitioners 3 and 5 are his daughters. After purchasing the said land, G. Naryana Swamy put up a compound wall around the whole extent of Ac. 8. 00. He also put up small tentaments and a watchman s quarter in the said land. It contains Municipal number bearing 8-2-269/8/1. After the death of Narayanaswamy, the said land was devolved upon all the petitioners herein.

( 4 ) DURING his life time, late Narayana Swamy entered into a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top