SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 706

V.V.S.RAO
Nataraj Theatre – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. – Respondent


V. V. S. RAO, J.

( 1 ) MESSERS Nataraj theatre has filed WP No. 21691 of 1995 praying for a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the memo issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh, the 1st respondent herein bearing No. 1730/genl. A1/ 94-3 dated 23-5-1995 (the impugned order) as illegal and arbitrary and also to set aside all the consequential orders issued by the Licensing Authority under the A. P. Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1955 (Act No. 4 of 1955, hereinafter referred to as the Act ). The other writ petition being WP No. 30691 of 1998 is filed by the Chand Talkies questioning the same impugned order. Messers Chand Talkies also questioned Rule 10-A of the A. P. Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1979 (hereinafter called as the Rules) as ultra-vires and unconstitutional insofar as the same imposes time limit for reduction of seating capacity in the petitioner s cinema theatre.

( 2 ) AS both the writ petitions came to be framed in the same set of facts and circumstances and raise common questions of law and facts, both the writ petitions are being disposed of by this common order.

( 3 ) BEFORE considering the questions of law, the facts leading to filing of these cases m






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top