K.N.SINGH, M.H.KANIA
Bharat Coking Coal LTD. : Tata Iron And Steel Company LTD. : Central Coalfields LTD. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar: State Of Bihar: Industrial Fuel Marketing Company – Respondent
JUDGMENT
SINGH, J.- In these appeals a common question of law is involved whether the State of Bihar had legal authority to execute leases in favour of the respondents for collection of slurry on payment of royalty to it. Since the questions involved in these appeals are common the same are being disposed of by a common judgment. Civil Appeal No. 4521 of 1986 and Civil Appeal Nos. 61-62 of 1987 are directed against the judgment of the Patna High Court while Civil Appeal Nos. 230-231 of 1987 are directed against the judgment of the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court.
2. In order to appreciate the controversy in question it is necessary to recapitulate the facts. M/s Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. - appellant in C.A. 4521 of 1986 is a Government Company which carries coal mining operations in village Sudamdih in the State of Bihar. There is a coal washery adjacent to the appellants coal mine in village Sudamdih. After the coal is extracted from the mines, it is crushed into pieces of different sizes for purposes of grading. Since the coal is mixed up with mud and other impurities, same is brought to the washery for washing and cleaning the same for reducing the ash percentage and for u
relied on : Baijnath Kedia v. State of Bihar
Hingir-Rampur Coal Co. Ltd. v. State of Orissa
Stale of Orissa v. MA. Tulloch and Co.
Stale of Tamil Nadu v. Hind Stone
Hingir-Rampur Coal Co. Ltd. v. State of Orissa
doubted : Rai Sahib Ram Jawaya Kapur v. State of Punjab
considered : State of Madhya Pradesh v. Thakur Bharat Singh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.