SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(AP) 1143

Y.V.NARAYANA
G. K. Naik – Appellant
Versus
Susheela Naik – Respondent


Y. V. NARAYANA, J.

( 1 ) THESE petitions have been filed seeking to review the common judgment dated 27-9-1999 delivered in second Appeal Nos. 239 and 40 of 1997.

( 2 ) BRIEF history: One Dr. Mandakini naik, Susheela Naik and G. K. Naik are sisters and brother. Claiming that the suit schedule property (House bearing Muncipal no. 1-11-254 together with mulgies and a well situated in Prakash Nagar, Begumpet, hyderabad) is her exclusive property by virtue of a will dated 8-5-1962 executed in her favour by her father late Krishnaji Naik, mandakini Naik filed OS No. 133 of 1983 on the file of the Principal Subordinate judge s Court, Rangareddy District, saroornagar, Hyderabad, against her brother G. K. Naik alleging that she is the owner of the said property and has been in continuous possession and enjoyment of the same right from the date of execution of the will. While so, her brother (G. K. Naik) has no manner of right, title or interest in the suit property and he is interfering with her peaceful possession of the plaint schedule property by instigating the tenants, who are in occupation of some portion of the suit property, not to pay rentals to her. It is alleged that on 21-6-1982












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top