SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 835

R.BAYAPU REDDY
N. Apalanarasamma – Appellant
Versus
N. Appa Rao – Respondent


R. BAYAPU REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is filed by the decree-holders in EP No. 373 of 1992 in OS No. 90 of 1986 on the file of the 1st Additional Subordinate Judge, Visakhapatnam, questioning the impugned orders dated 4-2-1993 passed in EA No. 1479 of 1992 in so far as they relate to the quantum of the amount for which execution was ordered.

( 2 ) THE revision-petitioners, who are the plaintiffs in OS No. 90 of 1986, filed the said suit for partition and separate possession of their share in the suit property against the respondents herein, and preliminary decree with costs was passed on 15-9-1992. The said preliminary decree had become final as it was not questioned by the defendants/ respondents. Subsequently, the plaintiffs, who are the decree-holders, filed EP No. 373 of 1992 for recovery of the suit costs awarded to them under the preliminary decree by seeking attachment and sale of the moveable property belonging to the defendants. The warrant of attachment was returned unexecuted on account of some obstruction caused by the judgment-debtors. Thereupon the decree-holders filed EA No. 1479 of 1992 for re-issue of the warrant of attachment to the Amin. At that stage, the defen













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top