SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(AP) 931

R.M.BAPAT
A. MANMOHAN SHAH – Appellant
Versus
GOPINATH – Respondent


R. M. BAPAT, J.

( 1 ) THE Review Petitioner herein was a landlord and the respondent herein was a tenant of the petition schedule premises. The petitioner herein filed r. C. C. No. 223 of 1981 on 27-7-1981 in thecourt of the Principal Rent Controller, hyderabad for eviction by terminating the tenancy of the respondent herein on various grounds. The Principal Rent Controller, Hyderabad, on evidence dismissed the claim of the landlord-petitioner herein. Aggrieved by the aforesaid oider, the landlord-review petitioner herein carried the matter in appeal by filing R. A. No. 19 of 1987 in the Court of the Additional Chief Judge, city Small Causes Court, Hyderabad. The learned Judge on hearing both sides dismissed the appeal. Aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment the landlord- review petitioner herein filed C. R. P. No. 679 of 1994 in this Court. This Court dismissed the aforesaid C. R. P. by an order dated 5-2-1997. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order, the landlord-review petitioner herein filed SLP (C) No. 15734 of 1997 in the Hon ble Supreme Court of India. On hearing the Hon ble supreme Court passed the following order:"learned Counsel for the petitioner states that a question about additi





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top