SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(AP) 1167

S.PARVATHA RAO
K. Ram Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


S. PARVATHA RAO, J.

( 1 ) ALL these Criminal Appeals are preferred under sub-section (1) of Section 341 of the Code f Criminal Procedure, 1973 ( the Code for short) by the accused in Calendar Cases 1 to 18 and 20 to 29 of 1997 on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate at Karimnagar, taken on file on complaints under Section 340 (1) (b) of the Code made by the Court of District and Sessions Judge at Karimnagar as complainant on the basis of orders made by that Court under Section 340 (1) of the Code. After the C. Cs. were taken on file by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate at Karimnagar, they were all (except C. C. No. 29) transferred to the Court of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad and they were re-numbered. For convenience, the Calendar Cases are referred to in this judgment as numbered originally on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate at Karimnagar. As the questions raised in these appeals are common, they were heard together and they are now being disposed of by this common judgment.

( 2 ) THE facts in C. C. No. 29 of 1997 are some what different and they are related to what happened in O. P. No. 723 of 1985 on the file of the District C
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top