SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 65

D.H.NASIR
O. Sheela Harry – Appellant
Versus
Capt. Mohd. Mirza – Respondent


D. H. NASIR, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal arises from an order passed in I. A. No. 1202/1994 in o. S. No. 1052/1994 on the file of the IV additional Judge, City Civil, Court, hyderabad, on 28-7-1995 dismissing the original plaintiffs petition for grantinginterim in junction.

( 2 ) THE appellant s case in short is that the respondents (original defendants) were interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the appellant s property being 2098 sq. years of land bearing Survey Nos. 76,78,79, 80 and 96 situated at Khairatabad Village, Anandnagar, hyderabad. The aforesaid suit schedule property originally belonged to the respondent No. 1. The same as purchased by TV. T. Gnananprakasam under a registered sale deed dated 13-3-1961. The purchaser was put into possession thereof since 1967. Thereafter, one Eunice James acquired the said property from N. T. Gnanaprakasam by virtue of a Release Deed on 26-4-1969 and the appellant acquired the same by virtue of Settlement Deeddated 17-8-1975 and, that since then the appellants are enjoying the same peacefully.

( 3 ) FURTHER, according to the appellants, respondentno. 2 with the help of antisocial elements was trying to interfere with the ap









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top