SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 162

D.H.NASIR, P.VENKATRAMA REDDY
Durgaram Prasad, Engineers and Contractors, Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. , rep. by the Chief Engineer, P. W. D. Buildings, Hyderabad – Respondent


P. VENKATARAMA REDDI, J.

( 1 ) IN these appeals filed under Section 38 of the Arbitration Act, the appellant-contractor is questioning the Judgment of the Additional Chief Judge, City Civil court in O. S. Nos. 133 and 140 of 1979. O. S. No. 133/1979 was filed by the appellant-firm under Sections 14 and 17 of the Arbitration Act to make the award dated 31 -3-1979 passed by the arbitrator a rule of the Court and to pass a decree in terms thereof. O. S. No. 140/1979 was filed by the Government of a. P. , the respondent herein, objecting to the award passed by the arbitrator under Sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act and seeking the relief to set aside the Award. The 2nd defendant in the suit is a retired Chief Engineer appointed by the Court on a Section 20 petition to act as an arbitrator in order to decide the disputes between the parties arising out of a contract for construction of Arts and science College building at Siddipet, Medak District.

( 2 ) THE Tender of the appellant was accepted in May, 1965 and the agreement was entered into on 22-5-1965. The value of the contract work awarded to the appellant was Rs. 11. 82 lakhs. The stipulated period for completion of the constr














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top