SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 932

D.H.NASIR, VENKATARAMA REDDY
Government Of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
V. Satyam Rao – Respondent


VENKATARAMA REDDI, J.

( 1 ) C. R. P. No/ 2460/1993, filed by the. Government of Andhra Pradesh, arises out of the Judgment and decree in O. S. No. 82/1991 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Karimnagar. That suit was filed under Section 14 (2) of the Arbitration Act praying the Court to make the award dated 8-8-1991 passed by the sole arbitrator a Rule of the Court. The suit was decreed. C. M. A. No. 891/1993 arises out of the application filed by the Government of A. P. in the same Court under Sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act to set aside the award. The said application, i. e. O. P. No. 65/1991 was dismissed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Karimnagar. The respondent-contractor was awarded a contract to execute the work-- Lining to Kakatiya Canal from KM 215 to 218, K. S. R. J. Project. The value of the work as per the contract was Rs. 35,55 lakhs which is less than the estimated value by 18%. The respondent entered into an agreement with the Superintending Engineer, I. and P. O. Construction Circle, Huzurabad, on 23-11-1981. A supplemental agreement was also entered into in March, 1982. The time for completion of the work was 12 months from the date of handing over th
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top