SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 892

K.S.SHRIVASTAVA
Mrs. Sons Optics rep. , by Partner Abdul Kareem – Appellant
Versus
Shyam Sunderbhargava – Respondent


K. S. SHRIVASTAV, J.

( 1 ) THIS is tenant s revision from the common judgment dated 16-2-1996 in r. A. No. 357/91 and R. A. No. 358/91 by which the common order dated 24-7-1991 on the file of the III Additional Rent Controller, Hyderabad, in R. C. No. 656/86 (old R. C. No. 302/84) and R. C. No. 268/87 was reversed and the petitioner-firm and its partners have been directed to vacate the suit accommodation.

( 2 ) THIS judgment shall also govern the disposal of C. R. P. 910/96 for the sake of brevity and convenience.

( 3 ) IT is no longer in dispute before me that the petitioner-firm was initially inducted as a tenant by the predecessor-in-title of the respondents, namely late Gopinath Bhargava on 23-8-1978 for a period of eleven months at the rate of Rs. 300-00 Ps. per month besides water charges and later the monthly rent of the building bearing No. 4-1-991 to 4-1-993/1, Abid Road, Hyderabad, popularly known as bhargava Buildings (in short suit accommodation ) for non-residential purposes. After the expiry of the lease period, the petitioner-firm continued as monthly tenant. The 1st respondent and his deceased mother, that is respondent No. 2, filed R. C. No. 656/86 (old R. C. No




























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top