( 1 ) THESE petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India have travelled through a hearing for admission before a learned single Judge, before a Division Bench, before a Full Bench and the Larger Bench of ours with the speed the Court could manage to generate keeping in view the nature of the cases and the urgency for their disposal the sooner the possible. The Division Bench which heard these petitions for admission noticed the contentions of the learned counsel for the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 11106 of 1995 and that of the learned Government Pleader and also the fact that a batch of writ petitions having a common contention are pending hearing before a Full Bench. The order dated 13-6-1995 directing the Registry of the Court to place the papers before the Chief Justice for appropriate orders as to posting reads as follows:-- "mr. M. V. Ramana Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, is challenging the method by which Kanekal Gram Panchayat was reserved in favour of Backward Classes by drawal of lots in accordance with what is adumbrated in Rule 8 (iii) of the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Reservation of seats of Ward Members and Offices of Sar