S. DASARADHA RAMA REDDI, J.

( 1 ) AS both the revision petitions involve common point, they are disposed of by a common judgment. C. R. P. No. 3129 of 1991

( 2 ) THE petitioner is a tenant of non-residential premises bearing Door no. 7/533 at Robertsonpet, Machilipatnam, belonging to the respondent. The respondent filed R. C. C. No. 19 of 1986 on the file of Rent Controller, machilipatnam, seeking eviction of the petitioner on the grounds of (1) default in payment of rents, (2) committing acts of waste and (3) for bonafide requirement. According to the averments in the eviction petition, the rent for premises was originally Rs. 600/ -. As the landlord wanted the premises to start his own business, the tenant promised to vacate the premises by the end of June, 1986 and pay in the meantime enhanced rent of Rs. 1,200/- per month. The landlord did not agree in the first instance but ultimately agreed to it. On 14-5-1986, the tenant sent Rs. 1,100/- towards rent due for this premises and another premises No. 7/532, which is the subject matter of C. R. P. No. 3130/91. Itwasappropriated by the landlord towardspartpaymentofrs. 600/- towards premises No. 7/533 and Rs. 500/- towards premises,n

Click Here to Read the rest of this document