SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(AP) 121

N.D.PATNAIK
Dealwell Engineering Works – Appellant
Versus
V. V. Choudary – Respondent


N. D. PATNAIK, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is filed under article 227 of the Constitution against the order passed by the District Forum under the Consumer Protection Act at Anantapur in C. D. No. 47 of 1991.

( 2 ) THE first respondent filed a complaint before the District Consumer Forum, Anantapur, under the Consumer Protection Act, alleging that he had placed an order with the petitioner for supply of some packaging machinery and paid an amount of Rs. 29,000 by way of two demand drafts, but the petitioner did not supply the machinery and requested the District Forum to direct the petitioner either to supply the machinery or refund the advance paid by him together with compensation. The petitioner did not appear before the District Forum in spite of notice being given to it and, therefore, the consumer forum ordered the petitioner to refund the advance amount paid by the first respondent with interest, with an option to the petitioner to deliver the machinery at the old rate after collecting the price by deducting the advance paid by the first respondent and also ordered payment of Rs. 10,000 by way of compensation.

( 3 ) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner contended that the d


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top