SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(AP) 64

V.NEELADRI RAO
Patri Seetharama Rao – Appellant
Versus
Kastufi Vijnana Bhaskaram – Respondent


V. NEELADRI RAO, J.

( 1 ) D-1 in OS 249/78, Sub Court. Guntur is the appellant herein. R-1 herein filed suit for partition f plalat-A aad b schedule properties iate five equal shares and for allotment of three such shares for separate possession of the same and for recovery of Rs. 2. 000/- from D-1 and D-2 as damages, future profits interest at the rate of 6% p. a. and costs. The trial court passed a preliminary decree for partition of plaint-A schedule properties into five equal shares and foi allataeat ef three such shares to plaintiff and for possession of the same aad it was confirmed by the first appellate court. Being aggrieved D-l preferred this appeal.

( 2 ) D-2 aad D-4 to D-6 are sons of D-l. D-4 herein for himself and as next friend of D-5 and D-6 herein filed OS 71/55 against D-l herein and others for partition of plaiat schedule properties therein whioh include plaint-A schedule house herein. That suit was dismissed for default on 26-2-57. Sri RMV Bhujangasayana Rao advocate appeared for the plaintiffs ia the above suit. He filed SC 209/60, Additional district Munsif s Court. Guntur against d 4 to D 6 herein for Rs 475/- being his fee in OS 71/55 and for interest at 15.



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top