SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(AP) 398

K.RAMASWAMY
B. K. Adarsh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


K. RAMA SWAMY, J.

( 1 ) THE Petitioner had produced a film titled sex VGYAN (Sex Education) and applied on Sept. , 18, 1987 to the Addl. Regional Officer, Central Board of Film Certification, at Hyderabad (4th respondent) for certification under S. 5-A of the Cinematograph Act (Act 37 of 1952) for short, "the Principal Act". The Examining Committee met on Oct. , 28, 1987 and on preview, recommended to grant a Certificate to the film with 13 cuts. On its placement before the Chairman on consideration of the material, he exercised suo motu power and referred to the Revising Committee which saw the film at Bombay on 18/11/1987. All the eight members unanimously recommended that the film in its present form be refused certification and on appeal, the Film Certification Appellate Tribunal confirmed it after seeing the film on 5/02/1988 and hearing the Counsel. The petitioner is assailing the legality of refusal to grant a Certificate (fit for exhibiting the film to the Adults ).

( 2 ) THE film starts with a Conference of Medicos and other delegates on sex education headed by Dr. Ravi Varma who prefaced with the need to enlighten the public on sex education in the modern society and



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top