SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(SC) 194

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
19th August 1964.
P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, C.J.I., K.N. WANCHOO, M. HIDAYATULLAH, J.C. SHAH AND N. RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR, JJ.
Ranjit D. Udeshi, Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra, Respondent.
Criminal Appeal No. 178 of 1962.
Advocates appeared
Messrs. R. K. Garg, S. C. Agarwal, D. P. Singh and M. K. Ramamurthi, Advocates of M/s. Ramamurthi and Co. and Mr. B. A. Desai, Advocate, for Appellant; Mr. C. K. Daphtary, Attorney General for India (M/s. O. P. Rana and R. H. Dhebar, Advocates with him), for Respondent.

Advocates:
B.V.DESAI, C.K.DAFTARY, D.P.Singh, M.K.RAMAMURTHI, O.P.RANA, R.H.Dhebar, R.K.GARG, RAMAMURTHI, S.C.AGRAWAL

Headnote:WORD “OBSCENE”—WHAT IS MEANT OR INTENDED TO MEAN NOT KNOWN—BUT GENERALLY ODD WORDS THAT BELONG TO BODY BELOW NAVEL HAVE COME TO BE JUDGED OBSCENE

       

Judgment

HIDAYATULLAH, J.: The Appellant is one of fourt partners of a firm which owns a book-stall in Bombay. He was prosecuted along with the other partners under section 292, Indian Penal Code. All the facts necessary for our purpose appear from the simple charge with two counts which was framed against them. It reads :

"That you accused Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 on or about the 12th day of December, 1959 at Bombay being the partners of a book-stall named Happy Book Stall were found in possession for the purpose of sale copies of an obscene book called Lady Chatterley s Lover (unexpurgated edition) which inter alia contained, obscene matter as detailed separately and attached herewith and thereby committed an offence punishable u/ s. 292 of the I. P. Code.

AND

That you Gokuldas Shamji on or about the 12th day of December 1959 at Bombay did sell to Bogus Customer Ali Raza Sayeed Hasan a copy of an obscene book called Lady Chatterley s Lover (unexpurgated edition) which inter alia contained obscene matter as detailed separately and attached herewith and thereby committed an offence punishable u/ s 292 of the I. P. Code."

The first count applied to the appellant who was accused No. 2 in the case. The Additional Chief Presidency Magistrate IIIrd Court, Esplanade, Bombay convicted all the partners on the first count and fined each of them Rs. 20 with one week s simple imprisonment in default. Gokuldas Shamji was additionally convicted on the second count and was sentenced to a further fine of Rs. 20 or like imprisonment in default. The Magistrate held that the offending book was obscene for purposes of the section. The present appellant filed a revision in the High Court of Bombay. The decision of the High Court was against him. He has now appealed to this Court by special leave and has raised the issue of freedom of speech and expression guaranteed by the nineteenth Article. Before the High Court he had questioned the finding of the Magistrate regarding the novel.

2. It is convenient to set out S. 292 of the Indian Penal Code at this stage :

"292. Whoever-

Sale of obscene books, etc.- (a) sells, lets to hire, distributes, publicly exhibits or in any manner puts into circulation, or for purposes of sale, hire distribution, public exhibition or circulation, makes, produces or has in his possession any obscene book, pamphlet, paper, drawing, painting, representation or figure or any other obscene object whatsoever, or

(b) imports, exports or conveys any obscene object for any of the purposes aforesaid, or knowing or having reason to believe that such object will be sold, let to hire, distributed or publicly exhibited or in any manner put into circulation, or

(c) takes part in or receives profits from any business in the course of which he knows or has reason to believe that any such obscene objects are, for any of the purposes aforesaid, made, produced, purchased, kept, imported, exported, conveyed, publicly exhibited or in any manner put into circulation, or

(d) advertises or makes known by any means whatsoever that any person is engaged or is ready to engage in any act which is an offence under this section, or that any such obscene object can be procured from or through any person, or

(e) offers or attempts to do any act which is an offence under this section, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three months, or with fine, or with both.

Exception- This section does not extend to any book, pamphlet, writing, drawing or painting kept or used bona fide for religious purposes or any representation, sculptured, engraved, painted or otherwise represented on, or in any temple, or on any car used for the conveyance of idols, or kept or used for any religious purpose.

3. To prove the requirements of the section the prosecution examined two witnesses. One was the test purchaser named in the charge and the other an Inspector of the Vigilance Department. These witnesses proved possession and sale of the












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top