RAMACHANDRA RAO, J.

( 1 ) (ON difference of opinion between Chennakesav Reddy and Lakshminarayan Reddy, JJ.):- Defendants 1 and 2 have filed this appeal against the judgment and decree in O. S. No. 578 of 1979 on the file of the 1st Addl. Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad decreeing the suit of the plaintiff for recovery of possession of the plaint schedule house together with the fittings and fixtures therein and for recovery of mesne profits from the date of suit.

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to this appeal are as follows :-THE suit house bearing No. 6-3-347/16 Dwarakapuri Colony, Panjagutta, Hyderabad belongs to one Smt. Prameela Reddy, examined as P. W. 3 in the case. The said house was let out for a period of one year under an unregistered lease deed dt. 13-4-1970 to a company Purushottam Traders Private Limited on a rental of Rs. 450/- per month for the building, and a monthly hiring charges of Rs. 150/- for use of the fittings, articles, furnishing and chattel lying on the premises at the time of the lease. The lease deed was signed by the Director H. C. Gupta, the 1st defendant, on behalf of the company. On 10-8-1978 the plaintiff purchased the house from P. W. 3 under a reg

Click Here to Read the rest of this document