A.R.LAKSHMANAN, C.KONDAIAH
Bamadev Panigrahi – Appellant
Versus
Monorama Raj – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal by the defendant is directed against the judgment and decree of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Srikakulam, in O. S. No. 76 of 1966 decreeing the plaintiffs suit for the recovery of a sum of the equipment of a cinema concern known as Kumar Touring Talkies.
( 2 ) THE material facts leading to this appeal may briefly be stated : The plaintiffs husband, late Profulla Kumar Raj and the defendant were friends. According to the plaint allegations, the plaintiffs husband had obtained a possessory mortgage. On 1-9-1957 from the Raja of Mandasa on 1-9-1957 from the raja of Mandasa in respect of a site measuring about Ac. 3-51 cents known as pula Thota which contains a bunglow in it, for a sum of Rs. 4,000. 00 with a view to run to cinema in that place. Profulla Kumar Raj, the plaintiffs husband, advanced from the year 1952 till the end of 1959 various sums amounting to Rs. 15,000. 00 to the defendant to meet his obligations under forest contracts which he had entered into with the Raja Seheb of Mandasa. The plaintiffs husband built a temporary cinema structure and erected a temporary pandal in a portion of the plaint schedule site. For the purpose of the pla
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.