SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(AP) 113

C.KONDAIAH, C.V.RAMULU
Sree Mullapudi Venkatarayud, Memorial Medial Trust, Tanuku – Appellant
Versus
Chirapu Varada Raju – Respondent


KONDAIAH, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant-trust for whose purpose and benefit Ac. 5-49 cents of land situate on the outskirts of Tanuku in the District of West Godavari, was acquired by the Land Acquisition Officer, the 2nd respondent herein, seeks to implead itself as a party to A. S. No. 352 of 1970 preferred by the Land Acquisition Officer and A. S. Nos. 411 and 412 of 1970 filed by the two claimants. Chitrapu Varadaraju and Kakarla Ravanamma, on the ground that it is a necessary or proper party. The applications have been dismissed by our learned brother A. D. V. Reddy, J. , holding that it is not a necessary party to the appeals. Hence these appeals.

( 2 ) SRI B. V. Subbaiah, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant, contended that his client is a necessary, or in any event, a property party to be brought on record in the aforesaid appeals preferred by the respective parties under Sec. 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter called the Act) as it is very much interested in the result of the appeals, and sought the aid of the provisions of Section 50 (2) of the Act and Order 1, Rule 10 and Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code in support of his plea.

( 3 ) SRI. N. Bap




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top