SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(AP) 93

GOPALA KRISHNAN NAIR
A. Janardhana Rao – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Transport Commissioner,kakinada – Respondent


GOPAL KRISHNAN NAIR, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition to prevent the Deputy Transport Commissioner, Kakinada from proceeding with an appeal filed before him by the 3rd respondent. The petitioner is the holder of a stage carriage permit for the route Sompeta-Srikakulam. The 3rd respondent has a permit to ply a stage carriage from Jagati to Tekkali Via Sompeta. A stretch of miles is common to both these routes. The petitioner applied to the Regional Transport Authority, Srikakulam, for variation of the timings prescribed for the plying of his bus. That was allowed, in spite of the objections raised by the 3rd respondent. The 3rd respondent thereupon moved the Deputy Transport Commissioner, Kakinada, in appeal. This appeal was entertained and an interim order suspending the operation of the order of the Regional Transport Authority was passed. The petitioners case is that no appeal lies under S. 64 of the Motor Vehicles Act (herein-after referred to as the Act) against the order passed by the Regional Transport Authority in the instant case. The Deputy Transport Commissioner had therefore no authority or jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. He has, therefore, to be


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top