SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(AP) 118

CHANDRASEKHARA SASTRI, UMAMAHESWARAM
Indurthi Srinivasa Rao – Appellant
Versus
Indurthi Venkata Narasimha Rao – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS revision petition arises under Section 115, Code of Civil Procedure. The application is to revise the order of the District Judge of Warangal setting aside an award in Case No. 102 of 1956 under Section 30 (c) of the Arbitration Act. The petitioner herein originally filed an appeal under Section 39 (1) (vi) of the Arbitration Act. But, on an objection taken by the office, he converted it into a revision petition under Section 115 C. P. C.

( 2 ) THE relevant facts for the disposal of the Civil Revision Petition are as follows:-- The parties viz. , Indurthi Srinivasa Rao and Indurthi Prahlada Rao represented by his guardian Anjani Bai and Indurthi Venkatanarasimha Rao referred their disputes to arbitration by executing an agreement on 11-2-1955 in favour of five arbitrators. The four arbitrators chose an umpire Kudikala Venkatarama Rao. As the award could not be made within four months, they executed a fresh agreement of reference dated 10-10-1955 in favour of the same arbitrators. An award was made on a plain sheet of paper signed by all the five arbitrators. On 17-4-1956 one of the arbitrators by name Murlidhar Rao died. The award dated 28-1-1956 was engrossed on stamp p















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top