SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(AP) 51

BHIMASANKARAM, P.CHANDRA REDDY, SRINIVASA CHARI
N. Veerabrahmam – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


( 1 ) REDDY, C. J. 1. The subject-matter of both the petitions is the order of the Government of Andhra Pradesh passed under Section 99-A of the Criminal Procedure Code in G. O. Ms. No. 501 Home (General-C) dated 23/03/1958.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is the author of a book called Bible Bandaram, which means the Treasure of the Bible. He claims to have dealt with the Bible from a scientific and rationalistic point of view. Being of opinion that it contains matter, which falls within the purview of Section 99-A, Criminal Procedure Code, the State Government declared that all copies of the aforesaid book, wherever found, should be forfeited to the Government. Pursuant to this, the books are said to have been confiscated by the officers concerned. These two petitions are filed in this Court challenging the validity of that order. Crl. M. P. No. 888 of 1958 is preferred under Section 99-B Criminal Procedure Code, while the Writ Petition raises the question of the constitutional validity of section 99-A.

( 3 ) THE main theme of the argument of the counsel for the petitioner in support of both the petitions is that Section 99-A of the Criminal Procedure Code offends Article 19 (1) (a) of the

















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top